Public diligence room
Reviewed July 23, 2026
Review the boundary before sharing project evidence.
These public materials are designed for the first buyer, technical, security, and commercial review. They explain what Doku proposes, what remains customer-controlled, and what must be settled in signed materials before restricted project evidence is exchanged.
No project files are needed. No public document on this site is a contract, certification, customer-specific architecture, or substitute for an accepted proposal and signed agreement.
Buyer-ready public materials
Give each reviewer the shortest relevant path.
Public security review
Verified public-site controls, deployment prerequisites, responsibility boundaries, and current assurance status.
Open security reviewCommercial decisionPublic commercial review
Buyer roles, proposal decisions, approval path, and the decisions that remain customer-specific.
Open commercial reviewSmaller paid stepPower-Critical Gate Diagnostic
The 10-business-day scope, fee range, evidence schedule, deliverables, participation, and acceptance rule.
Review diagnostic scopeMeasurement contractDesign-partner evaluation protocol
Pre-agreed baseline, measures, decision rights, evidence states, and day-90 acceptance path.
Open evaluation protocolIllustrative product evidenceChange-impact and closure report
A clearly labeled illustrative artifact showing a changed fact, impact register, decision, and audit trail.
Open sample reportExecutive summaryTwo-minute project brief
The problem, project fit, engagement path, and first conversation in a compact buyer-facing format.
Read the short briefReview sequence
Increase commitment only when the evidence supports it.
- 01Fit
Use 25 minutes to determine whether one live gate warrants more work. No project files are needed.
- 02Boundary
Name the contracting parties, technical authority, permitted evidence, architecture, commercial path, and decision rights.
- 03Decision
Stop, use the optional paid diagnostic, or approve a customer-specific 90-day proposal.
Technical authority
Doku supports the workflow. Accountable experts approve.
Doku may identify changed facts, propose consequences, organize review ownership, and assemble closure evidence. It does not approve engineering, utility, procurement, construction, or commissioning decisions.
The customer's owner's engineer, interconnection lead, source owner, and other responsible experts retain technical, contractual, and professional authority.
Start without a data room
Bring one gate and one deadline.
The first conversation uses high-level project facts only and determines whether any paid or evidence-bearing step is justified.